Legalising Nepali and Indian documents for work in Serbia: apostille or full legalisation
Indian documents carry an apostille, Nepali documents need full legalisation through four offices, and the Serbian Ministry of Justice runs both routes.
India is a party to the Hague Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents, so an Indian degree or police certificate is certified with a single apostille. Nepal is not a party, so Nepali documents go through full legalisation across four offices. The Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Serbia runs both routes on the Serbian side.
Two routes, one decision at the start
The first question is not which paper is needed but whether both states are parties to the Hague Convention. As the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Serbia explains, the apostille applies only where the state that issued the document and the state where it will be used are both parties. If one is not, the apostille is not available and the file goes to full legalisation.
For the corridors employers in Serbia use most, the split is clear. India is a party, so an Indian degree, birth certificate or police clearance is certified by the competent Indian authority with one apostille and is then ready for use in Serbia. Nepal, per the Hague Conference on Private International Law, is not a party, so a Nepali document must pass through a chain in which each office certifies the signature of the one before it.
The mistake we see most often is an employer ordering an apostille for a Nepali worker because the same step worked for an Indian hire. No office in Kathmandu can issue one, the worker is left without certified documents, and the single permit file stalls. The difference is settled at the start, before the worker pays for anything.
Full legalisation: the order of offices
The Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Serbia describes full legalisation as a chain no step can skip. A document moves from the basic court, to the Ministry of Justice, to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and finally to the diplomatic or consular mission of the state where the document will be used. Each office certifies the signature and seal of the previous one, so a document that reaches the ministry without the court certification is returned without action.
Running the other way, from Nepal into Serbia, the chain mirrors: the competent Nepali authority, the certifying Nepali ministry, then the diplomatic or consular mission of the Republic of Serbia responsible for Nepal. Serbia has no embassy in Kathmandu, so that last step goes to the mission that holds consular jurisdiction. This is why Nepali files run longer than Indian ones, and why they are started before the employment contract is signed rather than after.
For Serbian documents going abroad, the apostille is issued by the basic court in the seat of the authority that issued the document, again per the Ministry of Justice. That is the step an employer needs when sending its own papers out, a registration certificate for a foreign embassy file, for example.
| Country of origin | Hague Convention status | Certification route |
|---|---|---|
| India | party | apostille from the competent Indian authority |
| Nepal | not a party | full legalisation, a chain of four offices |
| Serbia, document for use abroad | party | apostille from the basic court in the issuer's seat |
The court translation, and what makes it unusable
Certification settles where a document came from, not what language it is in. Under the Rulebook on Work Permits, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia 6/2024, every document not in Serbian is filed with a certified court translator's translation. The translation is made after certification and never before, because the translator also renders the text of the apostille or the legalisation clause. A translation prepared first does not cover seals added later, and the file goes back for supplements.
The second recurring problem is the name. Nepali and Indian passports often carry a name in a different order or transliteration than the degree and the police certificate. If the spelling in the translation differs from the passport, the office cannot tie the documents to the person. Send the translator the passport page with every document so the spelling is fixed once, for the whole set.
The third is validity. Police and medical certificates have a short life, so a set certified too far ahead expires while the filing appointment is waited out. The working order is to secure degrees and civil status records first, since they do not age, and to obtain the certificates last.
Once the certified and translated set arrives, it feeds two separate procedures: the single permit file, and, where the post is regulated or requires a formal qualification, the recognition of foreign qualifications. The same set is requested by the consulate when the worker applies for the D visa for employment, and the translator and certification fees belong in the cost of hiring a foreign worker.
The order is the whole job: certification in the country of origin, then the court translation, then filing. An employer who knows which route each corridor runs on, Indian with an apostille or Nepali with full legalisation, avoids the weeks lost to a second certification round. How Werklist runs document sets by corridor is set out on the page for employers.
Keep reading
All posts →What a UK sponsor licence costs an employer in 2026
The Home Office charges £1,682 for a medium or large Worker sponsor licence, £525 per Certificate of Sponsorship and £1,320 a year in skills charge.
UK skilled worker salary thresholds and going rates 2026
The Home Office sets an hourly floor of GBP 17.13 under Table 1 of Appendix Skilled Occupations and GBP 12.82 under Table 2, each alongside the going rate.